KWrite

Is the Norwegian Nobel Committee a political activist body?

Here’s an excerpt of CNN’s interview with Norwegian Nobel Committee Chairman, Thorbjorn Jagland, right after he announced the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize result.

CNN: A great many people are delighted. Some people are shocked. He has been in office less than a year. Most of what he’s tried, he’s still just at a startup. Is the committee acting a little fast?

Thorbjorn Jagland: No, not at all. We want to promote what he stands for. And this is the long standing history of the Peace Nobel Committee. We want to enhance the ideals that Obama is promoting for.

So did he admit that the Norwegian Nobel Commitee (or the Peace Nobel Committee) is actually a political activist body that exists to promote certain agendas instead of recognizing good works that have been done? This doesn’t seem to agree with its formal constitution.

As a HR manager for a new company, I have opportunities to read tons of resumes sent to my inbox. Unlike what I thought, there are still too many applicants, especially student job seekers, highlighting their Multi-Tasking skill in the resumes. I usually deleted those applications immediately.

It’s a deadly mistake to include this skill in your resume.  The hype is so dead now.

(A victim of the ADHD syndrome, I many times multi-task as well. However, it is my weakness, not strength.)

Osama Bin Laden could have hidden himself from the American military but he’s probably unable to run away from the news of Michael Jackson’s death.

Within a few hours after MJ’s death, the Thriller skyrocketed to the no. 1 album on iTunes. Many media sites experienced traffic slowdown and even crashed multiple times. As of now, 2 days since the news, there is countless number of  news articles and online talks about this event. MJ’s albums have spectacularly and totally invaded the iTunes Top Albums charts in 25 countries and undoubtedly other music stores as well.

Phenomenal statistics, aren’t they? But the mind-boggling question is: do people care about his death or about him that much? I doubt it. OK, perhaps not the right question to ask. How’s about: are there that many people who really love his music? Hm, possibly. The more interesting question to me is: how do we understand the dynamics of a mass movement like this? It definitely doesn’t equal the sum of each individual’s behavior. Geeky speaking, any linear approximation to this highly non-linear fashion could yield dreadful decisions.

MJ is a perfect example for this kind of study but by no means the only one. One can also relate this case to the Obama effect, the Paris Hilton effect (aka. “you start getting famous for being famous”), or more seriously the credit crisis that has been affecting each of us.

The internet obviously has played a big role in magnifying the scale of these phenomena. Knowing that doesn’t make us happier and you may ask: is there any new marketing or valuation model hidden in these effects that we can learn? An unknown I wish to further understand.

The product hasn’t been released yet but you all can see the demo below.

In short, I bet anything that this product will revolutionize the way this world communicates, just like how emails triumphed over regular mails. The impact of this product can be as big as of Google Search. No joke!

… between the two most dominant clubs in the world: Manchester United (MU) vs. Barcelona (Barca).

Well, the media has been talking about the controversies after the epic semi-final (Chelsea vs. Barca) and they’ll continue talking/writing about it for weeks. It was such a hell of a game. I admit that Chelsea played better, tactically, in the 2nd leg but overall, Barca deserved the ticket to Rome for the final. Full respect to the players on both sides for their fighting spirit.

This game might not have been as entertaining as the historical victory of Barca over Real Madrid last weekend but it is of a much higher level and well depicts the true modern football. The players brought so many good flavors to the game: philosophy, tactics, and intensity.

Now, what is my take on the final game in Rome? The Barca team this season could go down in history as the most talented club team ever. As a consequence, their players are technically superior to MU’s ones. However, I’d give a slight edge to MU (55% for MU and 45% for Barca) because:

1. MU has more depth in their squad. They have decent (even high quality) backup players for almost almost every position on the field.
   • Barca’s defence, on the other hand, is very thin and becomes vulnarable whenever a first-team player misses due to injury or suspension. Today, in the game against Chelsea, they didn’t have the service of the Puyol and Toure was pulled back as a centre back. As a consequence, without the three musketeers Toure-Xavi-Iniesta, Barca’s midfield looked very dull.
   • Worst, in the final, they’ll miss 3 defenders. Gerard Pique can be a sufficient replacement for Rafael Marque but the two full backs positions will cause a lot of thinking for Pep Guardiola.
2. Though technically superior, Barca’s players are not as physical. If allowed space to play their style, they’re weapons of mass destruction. Otherwise, they’re stuck. This is nothing new. They dominated the game but got stuck twice this year against Chelsea. It was exactly the same last year, albeit different outcome, when they played against an “anti-football” MU.
3. Alex Ferguson won’t tell his players to play attacking football and be victims of Barca. Unlike his counterpart, Alex is too pragmatic and experienced. He’ll probably apply the same tactics that Hiddink used this year and he himself used last year: parking a bus in front of the goal and killed off the game through a couple of counter attacks.

In summary, the final will surely be another hell of a game. Despite the reasons above, I’m a supporter of Barca.

• Unlike at other clubs (even Manchester United or Arsenal), most of Barca’s talents (Puyol, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi, Pique, Valdes, Krkic) are home grown. Their youth academy La Masia can easily produce a full team that has the potential of winning the Champions League.
• Coached by a manager who grew up in Barcelona and has played for the team himself.
• Their uniforms don’t have the name of any corrupted insurance giant.
• Still, they’re one of the two best teams in the world.

Who on earth doesn’t love these boys?

It’s a must watch if you fall into one of these categories

• Adventurous Travelers
• Motorcycle Riders
• You grew up in, have been to, or have already planned to visit Vietnam

Part 1

Part 2

To a large number of observers, the now financial center of the universe is London, not New York City (see this and this [1]). I’m sure many of you will find it ridiculous but well, whatever you believe doesn’t change the deteriorating reality. Let’s see why what is what from an immigration view point [1.5]. Historically, America was famous as the Disneyland for talents. It doesn’t seem to be the case nowadays.

US. H1B Program.

Suppose that you’re an international citizen. You will need to apply for an H1B visa in order to work in the US. It’s a complex program but generally speaking, here are some relevant facts to keep in mind:

• You need a job offer and the sponsorship from an American company/institution in order to apply for the visa. Even if you’re a semi-superman but living in another country (or your country) at the time you apply for jobs, it isn’t that easy to get such an offer.
• Let’s keep assuming that you’re a semi-superman. You still may have to enter the H1B lottery game to decide your fate. The lottery is very likely if you don’t hold an advanced degree (Master or PhD).

How many talents would be crossed out by this system? A lot, I assume. Moreover, this complicated and hilarious process does discourage many smarties and a good percentage of them just don’t give a damn working in the US.

UK. Points-based Immigration System.

The UK has a fundamentally different program called Highly Skilled Migrant Program (HSMP) [2], besides the usual work permit system. Basically, you earn points by your track record including education level, age (the younger the better), income, UK experience, etc.. If you have enough points (75), you are automatically qualified to enter and work/do business in the country. No a priori job offer needed. No sponsorship. No quota and no lottery.

If you’ve received a PhD (50 points) from a UK university (5pts) and you’re 27 (20pts), then boom: they (British people) red carpet to welcome you. If your PhD is from somewhere else, a little income will qualify you as well. Until recently, an MBA from a top business school would also give you the unconditional access. Try this HSMP calculator to see if you fit in this highly discriminating system.

Is it similar to America post World War II?

Footnotes

[1] The NYTimes and Fortune magazine articles were published in 10/2006 and 08/2007 (respectively), when the US economy was much stronger than it is now. There are also numerous other writings on this newly debated subject.

[1.5] The rising or London (or decline of NYC) and their immigration policies are correlated. However, this article doesn’t assert with confidence that one is the cause of the other. On the cause, some joked that the British merely benefits from the influx of Russian millionaires/billionaires.

[2] The HSMP is being phased out and replaced by a similar program called Points-based Immigration System – Tier 1.

It’s not hard to figure out my above-average admiration for great public speakers. Steve Jobs and Randy Pausch are two examples that I’ve written about. We learn from those speeches not only their insightful thoughts but also their attitudes, their voices, their body languages, and their styles. There’s just so much to learn from such speeches. Here’s another personal reason: I admire people who can do what I unpleasantly can’t.

I’m sure you know what I’m going to say next. That is, I’ve listened to another fantastic talk, this time by Guy Kawasaki. A former Apple employee, he’s now a Silicon Valley venture capitalist and the author of the best-seller The Art of the Start. His talk, in 2006, was essentially about the title of this book, i.e. entrepreneurship. I haven’t read the book but from his talk, I can imagine how thoughtful it is.

Every point in his 40-minute presentation is worth being listened. This guy does possess a great sense of humor, on top of other master public speaking skills.

(PDF of slides here)

For out-of-state and international kids, UT Austin (or UT) is among the toughest undergraduate schools to get in.

According to the new statistics by the admissions office (published on the Daily Texans newspaper), 29619 high school students applied to UT. Of these, 12665 were admitted and among them are 9252 Texas high school students admitted under the controversial Top 10 Percent Law.

That leaves 20367 other students having competed for the remaining 3413 spots. So, the admission rate for students not qualified by the rule above is essentially 16.7%, as low as of Ivy league schools. If you’re an admitted out-of-state or international freshman, you have every reason to feel proud of yourself.

However, the almost 10000 students automatically admitted may damage your education at UT. Everyone knows that there are so many high schools in Texas at which a retard can end up in the top 10%. Texas legislators really need to revise this stupid law immediately if they want UT competitive. Here are a few options:

• Abandon the rule completely. I’d love to see this option implemented but it’s quite infeasible for a state school like UT.
• Change the rule from Top 10% to Top 5% or Top 3%. This alternative is not the best but still much better than the current law.
• Better yet, allocate the number of automatically qualified students for each specific high school according to its rating. It’s not expensive to compile/revise such a ranking every 2-3 years. Not only will UT admit the better students but this rule, if implemented, will also create incentives for Texas high schools to continuously improve to be competitive.